| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 09/25/2012 05:10 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 5 |
> On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:04:55 +0200 hasufell <hasufell@g.o> |
| 6 |
> wrote: |
| 7 |
>> Do we need an implementation beforehand? Afaik zac said that the |
| 8 |
>> implementation would not be very complicated, so why not vote on |
| 9 |
>> this now/soon? |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Well we can't really compare it to SDEPEND (which is implemented |
| 12 |
> in Paludis, for kdebuild-1 and exheres-0) without at least a |
| 13 |
> half-arsed implementation. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Also, speaking as someone who *has* implemented this kind of thing, |
| 16 |
> I have extreme doubts as to the viability of the proposal. So I'd |
| 17 |
> be extremely wary of voting in favour of it until we've been able |
| 18 |
> to have a play with an implementation. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
sorry? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I don't see an answers to any of my questions. |
| 24 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 25 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) |
| 26 |
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQYcrzAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWztIwH/jXV53rVzF4dAImZbOb/zkD1 |
| 29 |
MU8JfWnYLirERryoix6lhtvMKlSxSCthU+M0wmKYdQ/Rwo5bqkRrgeSgfLg5xQo+ |
| 30 |
wn9k6YhiU6a0pWNTpG6WUZM9n6vwXYiqBwTX2QAedaPMCw/SbxQeSeF4bq0XNrRC |
| 31 |
jmwUXKO3LhhQDREuSFXg55LqBbx9NeFvoPxUlqOf7lPl0jXlbu6B0pR5MpxEqysy |
| 32 |
IFqglzXMIrguk9u/UxY/Z3lDfDzA1zxI3zgDGUiZ5sVKMtqEg8iDNbdsr9K0Zg0H |
| 33 |
Qe6mbAFYj3V0Nb6lA6n2/54KjWzVKl9dGtzGQsjwyfu4IdbZNX3O5qi+4Y2CYck= |
| 34 |
=QaMz |
| 35 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives