| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1
|
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 17:04:55 +0200
|
| 5 |
hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
|
| 6 |
> Do we need an implementation beforehand? Afaik zac said that the |
| 7 |
> implementation would not be very complicated, so why not vote on this |
| 8 |
> now/soon? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Well we can't really compare it to SDEPEND (which is implemented in
|
| 11 |
Paludis, for kdebuild-1 and exheres-0) without at least a half-arsed
|
| 12 |
implementation.
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Also, speaking as someone who *has* implemented this kind of thing, I
|
| 15 |
have extreme doubts as to the viability of the proposal. So I'd be
|
| 16 |
extremely wary of voting in favour of it until we've been able to have
|
| 17 |
a play with an implementation.
|
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
- --
|
| 20 |
Ciaran McCreesh
|
| 21 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
| 22 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
iEYEARECAAYFAlBhyYMACgkQ96zL6DUtXhGPsQCeN6muE82mJOPm9aox2zd1r8p0
|
| 25 |
5scAn3JkHsHGqPkpBJNCH4Nb94zW7b5H
|
| 26 |
=LMaV
|
| 27 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives