Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Roy Bamford <neddyseagoon@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009)
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:18:08
Message-Id: 1235510283.3839.4@spike
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Issues regarding glep-55 (Was: [gentoo-council] Re: Preliminary Meeting-Topics for 12 February 2009) by Ciaran McCreesh
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 2009.02.24 16:48, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
5 [snip]
6 >
7 > PN and PV are metadata, same as EAPI.
8 >
9 [snip]
10 > --
11 > Ciaran McCreesh
12 >
13
14 So we made a mistake with PN and PV and may compound it with EAPI.
15 How long before we *must* have other pieces of information in the
16 filename?
17
18 When will the filename get so long as to become unwhieldy ?
19 Lets fix it properly now since it will be much more painful to put an
20 extendable solution in place later.
21
22 It reminds me of other hacks in the history of the PC which we would do
23 well not to repeat.
24 e.g. the MSDOS Partition Table, the Extended Partition, the High Memory
25 Area.
26
27 - --
28 Regards,
29
30 Roy Bamford
31 (NeddySeagoon) a member of
32 gentoo-ops
33 forum-mods
34 treecleaners
35 trustees
36 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
37 Version: GnuPG v2.0.10 (GNU/Linux)
38
39 iEYEARECAAYFAkmkZAsACgkQTE4/y7nJvatrUwCgpEKpHAF0hdbkZIJavjwXtABT
40 eXAAoPlWbQ0B4+F3YFPjrjCXHjuwS2m1
41 =r7kn
42 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies