| 1 |
Samuli Suominen schrieb: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> that's my impression now too since nobody has managed to provide useful |
| 4 |
> case for separate /usr, or they have been very vague like adding 1+1 on |
| 5 |
> / and /usr filesystem sizes and counting the risk of corrupted |
| 6 |
> filesystem from that (one word: backup) |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Maybe I have to explain in more detail: |
| 9 |
When is there a risk of data corruption involving /usr? For example, |
| 10 |
when the filesystem which contains /usr is being written to while the |
| 11 |
power fails or the kernel panics. But /usr is almost never written to, |
| 12 |
it is the other directories like /home, /var or the upcoming /run. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Backup is orthogonal to this question. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Best regards, |
| 18 |
Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyen |
Archives