| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 22:33:26 +0100 Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> | Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a): |
| 4 |
> | > | What on earth are you talking about here? And why almost 6 months |
| 5 |
> | > | is not enough for someone to respond on a bug with a simple |
| 6 |
> | > | "we'll only support newer versions and don't care about MySQL |
| 7 |
> | > | 4.0.x any more, go drop it"? |
| 8 |
> | > |
| 9 |
> | > Priorities. The arch teams could be too busy dealing with other bugs |
| 10 |
> | > that matter more or too busy dealing with noise bugs. |
| 11 |
> | |
| 12 |
> | Sorry, taking 1 minute to respond on a bug after being poked for a |
| 13 |
> | couple of months is not a matter of priorities, but mere politeness |
| 14 |
> | and common sense. Seriously, you can't work productively with other |
| 15 |
> | people if they can't be bothered to write one sentence for months. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
> There are an awful lot of bugs requiring an awful lot of attention... |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
That does bring up an interesting question though -- at what point do you just |
| 21 |
ignore the arch and move on so that development can continue? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I suppose if you had a nasty security verbump you needed to release, you could |
| 24 |
keyword it yourself, but for everything else, what's the best way to handle |
| 25 |
those if you are perpetually ignored? |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Steve |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives