Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jerry A! <jerry@×××××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Mailers, Mailers, Mailers!!!
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 15:50:19
Message-Id: 20010709174953.A23310@gemini.thehutt.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Mailers, Mailers, Mailers!!! by Grant Goodyear
1 On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 04:40:28PM -0500, Grant Goodyear wrote:
2 : > However, we do install ssmtp by default. This is a lightweight (it only
3 : > relays to a hub) /usr/{lib,sbin}/sendmail clone.
4 : >
5 : > It's so small I bet you didn't even notice it on your system. 8)
6 : >
7 : > But like I said, for a default install (remember, you too can create
8 : > your own profiles) I think it's wise to not alienate people trying out
9 : > Gentoo by not having "standard" tools. Now, I'm not saying out
10 : > /usr/bin/mail and /usr/sbin/sendmail need to be mailx and sendmail
11 : > proper (in fact I think nail and ssmtp make excellent replacements).
12 : > But I do think that something should be there to meet today's baseline
13 : > expectations.
14 :
15 : You're right, I didn't know that. Fair enough! I just didn't
16 : want to install sendmail by default because it's awfully large.
17
18 So, would you be adverse to the idea of me updating nail to RDEPEND on
19 virtual/mta? I'll ask Achim to have the nail/ssmtp combo be in the
20 default profile.
21
22 Mostly, I'd just like our mail architecture to behave as sanely and
23 consistently as possible no matter what combination of programs we use.
24
25 --Jerry
26
27 name: Jerry Alexandratos || Open-Source software isn't a
28 phone: 703.599.6023 || matter of life or death...
29 email: jerry@×××××××.org || ...It's much more important
30 || than that!

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Mailers, Mailers, Mailers!!! Daniel Robbins <drobbins@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Mailers, Mailers, Mailers!!! Grant Goodyear <grant@×××××××××××××××××.edu>