Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] EJOBS variable for EAPI 5? (was: [RFC] Create a JOBS variable to replace -jX in MAKEOPTS) | ||
| Date: | Fri, 31 Aug 2012 14:48:19 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20120831154521.5258c549@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] EJOBS variable for EAPI 5? (was: [RFC] Create a JOBS variable to replace -jX in MAKEOPTS) by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | On Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:21:15 +0200 |
| 2 | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > Coming back to this old topic [1]. Is there still consensus that we |
| 4 | > should have such an EJOBS variable? (It shouldn't be called JOBS |
| 5 | > because this name is too generic, see the old discussion.) Then we |
| 6 | > could add it to EAPI 5. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > Ulrich |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > [1] |
| 11 | > <http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_750e33f68b16d971dff1f40dd9145e56.xml> |
| 12 | |
| 13 | If we're doing this, do we tell users to stop setting MAKEOPTS for |
| 14 | EAPIs 5 and greater? Do we change the name of MAKEOPTS for EAPIs 5 and |
| 15 | greater instead? Do we put fancy code in the package mangler to deal |
| 16 | with it? |
| 17 | |
| 18 | -- |
| 19 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] EJOBS variable for EAPI 5? (was: [RFC] Create a JOBS variable to replace -jX in MAKEOPTS) | Alexis Ballier <aballier@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] EJOBS variable for EAPI 5? (was: [RFC] Create a JOBS variable to replace -jX in MAKEOPTS) | Alexandre Rostovtsev <tetromino@g.o> |