1 |
On Thursday 05 January 2006 23:04, Curtis Napier wrote: |
2 |
> > No, that's censored to only display what certain people want it to say |
3 |
> > rather than the truth of what's going on. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> Censored? Please expand on this, how is it censored? I thought we were |
6 |
> allowed to put anything Gentoo related we want to in our Gentoo blog? |
7 |
|
8 |
It's censored in the sense, that you limit the audience. Blog's are not suited |
9 |
for general information/discussion, because no one wants to monitor dozens of |
10 |
them and follow multiple threads on different web pages on one and the same |
11 |
topic. Weblogs are useful for people who feel it's necessary to have their |
12 |
own prominent place to raise their voice - a self-projection thingie, that's |
13 |
all. And therefore 99,5% of all the blogs are superfluous. Also a blog owner |
14 |
controls the comments and can delete them as he likes (less important, since |
15 |
it lets him not look good, but he can). |
16 |
|
17 |
To make it short: When you really have something important to say, post it to |
18 |
the appropriate mailing list - and post the whole text, not a ridiculous link |
19 |
to your blog, most people are not interested in and won't read! The same goes |
20 |
for our userbase: They're right to expect a single source of general |
21 |
information and one for security information, but not being forced to follow |
22 |
lots of blogs. |
23 |
|
24 |
|
25 |
Carsten |