| 1 |
On Tuesday 26 of February 2013 11:44:31 Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I see a *HUGE* reason. glibc ships with ptmalloc. If you think they |
| 4 |
> > should use jemalloc, talk to them. Don't just do it in Gentoo. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Certainly I think it would be far more productive to talk to the glibc |
| 7 |
> maintainers first. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
You mean productive like below? ;) |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11261 |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Ulrich Drepper: |
| 14 |
"Stop reopening. There is a solution for people who are stupid enough to |
| 15 |
create too many threads. No implementation will be perfect for everyone. The |
| 16 |
glibc implementation is tuned for reasonable programs and will run much faster |
| 17 |
than any other I tested." |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Merge of jemalloc upstream is likely never going to happen. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
regards |
| 22 |
MM |
Archives