Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Jeff Gardner <je_fro@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Why I don't think the CoC is a good idea
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2007 09:18:43
Message-Id: 45F90EBB.6010409@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Why I don't think the CoC is a good idea by "Kevin F. Quinn"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 > Alexandre Buisse <nattfodd@g.o> wrote:
5 >
6 >> [...] But then, why do we need a Code of Conduct at all?
7
8 I don't see as we need a CoC at all. The Etiquette policy should
9 suffice. We're all adults here and we don't need another
10 babysitter^H^H^H^H^H^H^H police force to watch our every move.
11
12 The more I read of this, the more I'm convinced that all this yapping
13 amounts to a few people seeking justification for kicking ciaranm off
14 the list.
15
16 As for gentoo losing developers over a spat on IRC or a ML, well.. I for
17 one question the motivation and dedication of anyone deciding to resign
18 over something so childish....
19
20 Thanks For Reading,
21 je_fro
22
23 - --
24 Jeff Gardner
25 Gentoo Developer
26 Public PGP Key ID: 4A5D8F23
27 hkp://subkeys.pgp.net
28 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
29 Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
30 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
31
32 iD8DBQFF+Q67iR2KxEpdjyMRAt1pAJ0ftne8NNz13bFUbNxupQ8QZ9DiCwCguzka
33 DF4cQNrczoxp91bgH+KLhxk=
34 =sTNI
35 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
36 --
37 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Why I don't think the CoC is a good idea Sune Kloppenborg Jeppesen <jaervosz@g.o>