| 1 |
Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Thu, 2006-08-24 at 14:00 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: |
| 3 |
>> Oh, gimme a break. Screaming about it on -dev for hundreds of posts |
| 4 |
>> isn't just equivalent to a vote, it's better. It makes people think |
| 5 |
>> there's more than 2 developers opposed to it. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> Really? Even you didn't remember that *I* was opposed to Sunrise and |
| 8 |
> probably accounted for at least a good 50 responses. Yes, good came |
| 9 |
> from it. Yes, it could have been done much, much better. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Sunrise is a poor example for me, because I ignored all the discussion |
| 12 |
on it past a certain point. It was just rehashing the same points over, |
| 13 |
and over, and over... |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
> Hopefully, to streamline processes and give power back to individual |
| 16 |
> projects to govern themselves in internal matters and let people get |
| 17 |
> back to doing development. That's a goal I would love to see us strive |
| 18 |
> to achieve in the next year. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
From what I see, projects are pretty free to govern themselves. How do |
| 21 |
you see it differently? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
As Weeve said, he's still trying to get people to stop breaking SPARC |
| 24 |
keywords, just like 3 years ago. It's just when trying to do anything |
| 25 |
larger than a single project that you run into issues. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Thanks, |
| 28 |
Donnie |
Archives