1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
On 2009.05.06 19:32, Peter Faraday Weller wrote: |
5 |
> On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 01:45 +0300, Markos Chandras wrote: |
6 |
> > On Tuesday 05 May 2009 23:45:14 AllenJB wrote: |
7 |
> [..snip..] |
8 |
> > I am sure there are some developers which can offer a great amount |
9 |
> of time to |
10 |
> > help/revibe slacking or dead projects ( e.g. userrel, newsletters |
11 |
> etc ). The |
12 |
> > thing is that leadership on several projects is inactive hence |
13 |
> users |
14 |
> or devs |
15 |
> > who are willing to help are getting demotivated. It would be really |
16 |
> nice each |
17 |
> > individual project to perform a clean up like: |
18 |
[snip] |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > Looking 'active' is very important to attract new people to |
21 |
> project. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> > |
24 |
> > Is this so hard? |
25 |
|
26 |
[snip] |
27 |
> The only issue I have with the idea is that projects with dead |
28 |
> members |
29 |
> and slacking leaders are unlikely to perform such a task, so you'll |
30 |
> never get any updates from them, so devs will be demotivated to work |
31 |
> on |
32 |
> $project, and thus we enter the vicious cycle again... |
33 |
> |
34 |
> welp |
35 |
> |
36 |
Welp, |
37 |
|
38 |
Not so. |
39 |
|
40 |
These projects would be delegated upwards to the council and either |
41 |
scrapped offically, or some recruitment process started to breath new |
42 |
life into them. |
43 |
|
44 |
Maybe dead projects are cleaned like treecleaners ? |
45 |
|
46 |
- -- |
47 |
Regards, |
48 |
|
49 |
Roy Bamford |
50 |
(NeddySeagoon) a member of |
51 |
gentoo-ops |
52 |
forum-mods |
53 |
treecleaners |
54 |
trustees |
55 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
56 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux) |
57 |
|
58 |
iEYEARECAAYFAkoB2bkACgkQTE4/y7nJvau9rgCdEnTDAizW16ACkZYm/Ei0i3gF |
59 |
XhQAoNED5Cgsr+YwxQ3EK34acLCTu1oF |
60 |
=wOxS |
61 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |