1 |
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> On Thu, Aug 09, 2012 at 03:47:19PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: |
4 |
>>> On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés <caneko@×××××.com> wrote: |
5 |
>>> > |
6 |
>>> > I agree with Greg Kroah-Hartman: I actually like (and want) a |
7 |
>>> > "vertically integrated, tightly coupled way of doing things". |
8 |
>>> |
9 |
>>> Well, if you completely agreed with him you wouldn't be running Gentoo |
10 |
>>> (or Debian, or other general-purpose distros). He advocates that |
11 |
>>> ordinary users should use more purpose-driven distros, where all of |
12 |
>>> this stuff is less of an issue. |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> That is not what I said, or mean at all. |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> Given that I'm a Gentoo developer, and have been for a very long time, I |
17 |
>> find it very strange that you would think otherwise. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> I did clarify my post in a reply, linking to your post and of course |
20 |
> stating that you could clarify. Your words were: "I just don't |
21 |
> think it can be done well, sorry, which is why I strongly recommend |
22 |
> tightly-coupled distros for desktops for anyone (like Fedora or |
23 |
> openSUSE or Ubuntu), and Debian or Gentoo only for servers or embedded |
24 |
> systems where you know exactly what you are putting together, and why |
25 |
> you are doing it that way." |
26 |
> |
27 |
> I'm not a big fan of putting words in mouths, so if I misread that |
28 |
> than I apologize. In any case, I can't really argue much with that |
29 |
> statement as-is, although I'd probably carve out an additional |
30 |
> exception for enthusiasts or those who otherwise like to tinker under |
31 |
> the hood. |
32 |
> |
33 |
> If you want strong vertical integration, you probably will never get |
34 |
> as much of it with Gentoo as you might get with a tightly-coupled |
35 |
> distro. |
36 |
|
37 |
You can get as much vertical integration with Gentoo as with any other |
38 |
distro. The problem (and I think this is the point Greg is trying to |
39 |
make) is that it will be harder (not impossible, just harder) if most |
40 |
of Gentoo developers really believe that every single possible |
41 |
combination of hardware, software, init systems, and even OS kernels |
42 |
should be supported. |
43 |
|
44 |
I myself believe that any Gentoo dev should support whatever the hell |
45 |
s/he wants to; I'm just interested in that if some of us want vertical |
46 |
integration, it should be easier to get. Right now every single Gentoo |
47 |
install from the official tree has OpenRC installed, because is pulled |
48 |
in by baselayout, and OpenRC also pulls sysvinit. And I'm not talking |
49 |
about some text files (even if they are executables) in /etc/init.d; |
50 |
I'm talking about executable binaries and libraries in every Gentoo |
51 |
install, even if the user has systemd, and they don't use |
52 |
OpenRC/sysvinit at all. Not to mention that they need to compile both |
53 |
packages if they ever upgrade (which doesn't happen that much, I |
54 |
agree). |
55 |
|
56 |
Regards. |
57 |
-- |
58 |
Canek Peláez Valdés |
59 |
Posgrado en Ciencia e Ingeniería de la Computación |
60 |
Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México |