Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Nathan L. Adams" <nadams@××××.org>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 (Was: Getting Important Updates To Users)
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 01:16:59
Message-Id: 436AB50B.2000403@ieee.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP 42 (Was: Getting Important Updates To Users) by Stuart Herbert
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Stuart Herbert wrote:
5 > On Tue, 2005-11-01 at 14:51 -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
6 >
7 >>Did you specifically ask them if it is because we have different news in
8 >>different locations? Somehow I think you're obscuring some facts to
9 >>make your own argument.
10 >
11 >
12 > That seems an unpleasant accusation to make :(
13 >
14 > The answer is that I didn't ask them if it was because we have different
15 > news in different locations. The question didn't occur to me.
16 >
17 >
18 >>The only problem that we have now with our multiple mediums is that not
19 >>all news is on all mediums. We should have the same information going
20 >>to all of these and let the user choose which method they like for
21 >>getting news.
22 >
23 >
24 > The critical difference between improving our existing mediums, and the
25 > emerge --news approach that I've proposed, is that emerge --news is the
26 > only approach that actively pushes news out to *all* users, and puts it
27 > in a place that is as guaranteed as anything else available to catch
28 > their attention.
29 >
30 > All the other approaches rely on the user going somewhere to get news,
31 > whether it's signing up to a mailing list, reading www.g.o, reading the
32 > forums, or whatever. Inevitably, this is only going to reach a smaller
33 > subsection of our user community.
34 >
35 > What I care about is that we've taken the right steps to put important
36 > information in front of *all* of our users (and our devs!). Even
37 > (especially?) the ones who are unable to keep up with the news as it is
38 > currently delivered.
39 >
40 > Making sure our users are well-informed improves the level and quality
41 > of service that we provide; it can only enhance our reputation; and it
42 > should also cut down on the amount of developer time that goes into
43 > post-upgrade support (leaving more time for package maintenance).
44 >
45
46 One source: http://errata.gentoo.org/
47
48 Push that out to as many alternate sources as you like (RSS feeds,
49 summaries in emerge --news, forums post, etc.), but make it known that
50 the website is *the* source (your alternate sources should point back to
51 it).
52 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
53 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
54
55 iD8DBQFDarUL2QTTR4CNEQARAh0pAKCi7BJpBOkRRT4iiaXUjajwbrjseACfahPV
56 R2MVvKhkLfnid1/ADRUZAxk=
57 =Oou4
58 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
59 --
60 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies