Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: twofourtysix <twofourtysix@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Software patents
Date: Tue, 05 Jul 2005 06:02:59
Message-Id: 6fd8e3c050704225956c4b269@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Software patents by Robert Paskowitz
1 On 05/07/05, Robert Paskowitz <r2d2@g.o> wrote:
2 > You have encouraged gentoo to remove patent-encoumbered software from
3 > portage. I'd like to see you personally work with only software that
4 > does not contain any patented work.
5
6 No, I have encouraged Gentoo to remove software written by companies
7 who are strongly behind software patents. Big difference. It's so easy
8 to get software patents in the USA currently that it's likely that
9 every single thing in the tree is covered by some bogus software
10 patent. However, in most cases, these patents are not held by the same
11 people who are making the software.
12
13 > > I applaud Gentoo's
14 > > efforts in displaying the banners, but so long as Gentoo continues to
15 > > assist and advertise for the very companies who are pushing for
16 > > software patents, I do not see it as a particularly credible protest.
17 > > Would it not be better to avoid becoming involved in the issue
18 > > entirely if one is not prepared to back up a cute little banner with
19 > > actual actions?
20 > >
21 > Gentoo has made no such efforts. Some developers have taken it upon
22 > themselves to make their feelings heard. For those that don't
23 > instinctively realise that planet.gentoo.org agregates stuff writen by
24 > individuals, the following notice is at the bottom of the page:
25 >
26 > Views expressed in the content shown above do not necessarily represent
27 > the views of Gentoo Linux or the Gentoo Foundation.
28
29 Oh come on. The planet is a service provided by Gentoo, with content
30 provided by Gentoo developers, which is hosted on a Gentoo domain,
31 presumably using Gentoo hardware. A cute disclaimer doesn't change its
32 status.
33
34 If you seriously think that content provided via the planet is not
35 representative of Gentoo views, I invite you to try posting something
36 really offensive to it and see how long it lasts. If it remains
37 uncensored, I'll accept that Gentoo as an organisation has no
38 influence over the content. Otherwise, by moderating the contents,
39 Gentoo is implicitly accepting responsibility for the items which
40 remain.
41
42 --
43 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Software patents Jon Portnoy <avenj@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Software patents Robert Paskowitz <r2d2@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Software patents Stuart Longland <redhatter@g.o>