1 |
On 22/08/2003 at 15:57:43(-0400), Jason Wever used 1.1K just to say: |
2 |
> My vote would be for parted instead of either of these. fdisk can be |
3 |
> buggy to the point of being unusable on sparc where parted works with no |
4 |
> problems in the same scenario. |
5 |
|
6 |
I few points I have against parted: |
7 |
|
8 |
(parted) mkpart p 2000 |
9 |
End? .... how do I say "the end of the disk" here |
10 |
|
11 |
I see that "print" would give us the size of the disk but the interface of |
12 |
parted is frustrating. |
13 |
|
14 |
fdisk has default values for start and end, pointing at the start and end of |
15 |
free space -- very useful. |
16 |
|
17 |
It is easier to create a 1G partition with fdisk using the "+1G" syntax. Parted |
18 |
requires the starting and ending "megabyte". |
19 |
|
20 |
It is easy to make a mistake with parted mostly because it *commits* *changes* |
21 |
*immediately*. There is no undo. |
22 |
|
23 |
Lastly I am not a sparc user. If parted is better for the sparc, I guess it |
24 |
would be better to have parted there, but please, don't screw the x86 CDs. |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
/ Georgi Georgiev / Possessions increase to fill the space / |
28 |
\ chutz@×××.net \ available for their storage. -- Ryan \ |
29 |
/ +81(90)6266-1163 / / |