| 1 |
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 23:11:36 -0400 |
| 2 |
Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> we've already discussed POSIX strictness in the tree multiple times, |
| 5 |
> and it's been shot down multiple times for good reason. GNU |
| 6 |
> extensions make life a hell of a lot easier, the majority of people |
| 7 |
> are developing/testing on such systems (Linux with GNU userland), and |
| 8 |
> the burden on other ports is trivial if not negligible. let's stop |
| 9 |
> kicking this horse as we're at the glue stage now. -mike |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
OK, right, so where are we heading with this? sys-apps/sed is in system |
| 12 |
and it's bound to be >=sed-4 and we're sticking with it. So are we |
| 13 |
going to get rid of it in all the ebuilds that still set that dep? |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
jer |
Archives