| 1 |
On Sunday 18 July 2004 2:10 pm, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> Well, that can't happen across the board until 2.6.x works on |
| 4 |
> everything. OTOH, it'd be nice if we started suggesting udev (without |
| 5 |
> that wretched tarball hack) for anyone running 2.6.x. Aside from one |
| 6 |
> rather nasty 64bit-related b0rkage, udev's been doing very nicely. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Right. I didn't mean that as a question of 'where should we be Now', but |
| 9 |
'where do we want to be later'... it's probably a foregone conclusion |
| 10 |
(with gregkh steering things) that udev is on its way, but perhaps that |
| 11 |
leaves a question mark of where how we will support devfs when that |
| 12 |
happens. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
That said, I don't know how many hacks exist in the package tree to add |
| 15 |
udev support. Supporting both might be trivial, therefore my assumptions |
| 16 |
might be wrong. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Maybe gregkh can comment on this in detail. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Cheers, |
| 21 |
Dylan Carlson [absinthe@g.o] |
| 22 |
Public Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x708E165F |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives