| 1 |
[ argh! resend to list this time... yay for inconsistent mailing list |
| 2 |
headers and a few strange people who get upset with Cc:s :) ] |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 13:53:52 -0400 Dylan Carlson <absinthe@g.o> |
| 5 |
wrote: |
| 6 |
| Do we have a plan to deprecate devfs or do we plan to support both |
| 7 |
| udev and devfs indefinitely? If we can get some agreement on how |
| 8 |
| profiles should be handled in the future (referencing our previous |
| 9 |
| thread on static profiles and things like GLEP19), I think it would |
| 10 |
| make sense to standardize on udev going forward. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Well, that can't happen across the board until 2.6.x works on |
| 13 |
everything. OTOH, it'd be nice if we started suggesting udev (without |
| 14 |
that wretched tarball hack) for anyone running 2.6.x. Aside from one |
| 15 |
rather nasty 64bit-related b0rkage, udev's been doing very nicely. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Sparc, MIPS, Vim, Fluxbox) |
| 19 |
Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 20 |
Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Archives