| 1 |
maillog: 18/07/2004-19:10:04(+0100): Ciaran McCreesh types |
| 2 |
> [ argh! resend to list this time... yay for inconsistent mailing list |
| 3 |
> headers and a few strange people who get upset with Cc:s :) ] |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 13:53:52 -0400 Dylan Carlson <absinthe@g.o> |
| 6 |
> wrote: |
| 7 |
> | Do we have a plan to deprecate devfs or do we plan to support both |
| 8 |
> | udev and devfs indefinitely? If we can get some agreement on how |
| 9 |
> | profiles should be handled in the future (referencing our previous |
| 10 |
> | thread on static profiles and things like GLEP19), I think it would |
| 11 |
> | make sense to standardize on udev going forward. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Well, that can't happen across the board until 2.6.x works on |
| 14 |
> everything. OTOH, it'd be nice if we started suggesting udev (without |
| 15 |
> that wretched tarball hack) for anyone running 2.6.x. Aside from one |
| 16 |
> rather nasty 64bit-related b0rkage, udev's been doing very nicely. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Regarding the wretched tarball hack. There is a suggestion at |
| 19 |
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57110 that makes the hack less wretched |
| 20 |
and even useful. I didn't dare use it before, but now: |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
$ tar tjf /lib/udev-state/devices.tar.bz2 |
| 23 |
MAKEDEV |
| 24 |
video/mga_vid0 |
| 25 |
mga_vid |
| 26 |
vmnet0 |
| 27 |
vmnet1 |
| 28 |
vmnet2 |
| 29 |
vmnet3 |
| 30 |
vmnet4 |
| 31 |
vmnet5 |
| 32 |
vmnet6 |
| 33 |
vmnet7 |
| 34 |
vmnet8 |
| 35 |
vmnet9 |
| 36 |
sndstat |
| 37 |
dri/card0 |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
All it needs is attention. |
| 40 |
|
| 41 |
-- |
| 42 |
| Georgi Georgiev | If he should ever change his faith, it'll | |
| 43 |
| chutz@×××.net | be because he no longer thinks he's God. | |
| 44 |
| +81(90)6266-1163 | | |
Archives