Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Greg KH <gregkh@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Kernel sources thread
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 05:43:47
Message-Id: 20040721053801.GD15099@kroah.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Kernel sources thread by Georgi Georgiev
1 On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 06:23:02AM +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
2 > maillog: 18/07/2004-19:10:04(+0100): Ciaran McCreesh types
3 > > [ argh! resend to list this time... yay for inconsistent mailing list
4 > > headers and a few strange people who get upset with Cc:s :) ]
5 > >
6 > > On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 13:53:52 -0400 Dylan Carlson <absinthe@g.o>
7 > > wrote:
8 > > | Do we have a plan to deprecate devfs or do we plan to support both
9 > > | udev and devfs indefinitely? If we can get some agreement on how
10 > > | profiles should be handled in the future (referencing our previous
11 > > | thread on static profiles and things like GLEP19), I think it would
12 > > | make sense to standardize on udev going forward.
13 > >
14 > > Well, that can't happen across the board until 2.6.x works on
15 > > everything. OTOH, it'd be nice if we started suggesting udev (without
16 > > that wretched tarball hack) for anyone running 2.6.x. Aside from one
17 > > rather nasty 64bit-related b0rkage, udev's been doing very nicely.
18 >
19 > Regarding the wretched tarball hack. There is a suggestion at
20 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57110 that makes the hack less wretched
21 > and even useful. I didn't dare use it before, but now:
22 >
23 > $ tar tjf /lib/udev-state/devices.tar.bz2
24 > MAKEDEV
25
26 What is this still needed for? LSB stuff?
27
28 > video/mga_vid0
29 > mga_vid
30
31 Hm, what driver needs these? These are not in the LANANA documenation
32 for device nodes.
33
34 > vmnet0
35 > vmnet1
36 > vmnet2
37 > vmnet3
38 > vmnet4
39 > vmnet5
40 > vmnet6
41 > vmnet7
42 > vmnet8
43 > vmnet9
44
45 I think the vmware package already creates these as my machines somehow
46 "just work" with udev and vmware today.
47
48 > sndstat
49
50 Hm, are you sure you need this? This should just work on the newer 2.6
51 kernels.
52
53 > dri/card0
54
55 Ah yes, DRI. What fun...
56 Anyway, the dri developers are working on this, so I'm leaving it up to
57 their very capable hands for now.
58
59 > All it needs is attention.
60
61 I agree. Bug me about this if anyone knows of any other device nodes
62 that they need (and have the hardware for) that udev doesn't currently
63 create.
64
65 thanks,
66
67 greg k-h
68
69 --
70 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Kernel sources thread Georgi Georgiev <chutz@×××.net>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Kernel sources thread Paul Varner <gentoo-dev@××××××××××××.org>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Kernel sources thread Chris Gianelloni <wolf31o2@g.o>