| 1 |
On Tue, Nov 22, 2005 at 08:29:36PM -0800, Tuan Van wrote: |
| 2 |
> Luis F. Araujo wrote: |
| 3 |
> >Hello everyone, |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> >A few days ago i glanced over package.mask , and i was surprised |
| 6 |
> >about how many non-existent ebuild/packages entries are there. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> please adjust your script. |
| 10 |
> >=cat/foo-1.2 is valid even though foo-1.2 is no longer in the tree. I |
| 11 |
> looked at the top 4 line in your list, they are all valid entries. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
yes, i imagine there are a bunch of these false positives ... you can |
| 14 |
see the gcc-config mask is wrongly flagged for this reason |
| 15 |
-mike |
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives