1 |
On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 12:31 +0200, Rolf Eike Beer wrote: |
2 |
> Am Donnerstag, 10. Oktober 2019, 12:15:09 CEST schrieb Michał Górny: |
3 |
> > Dnia October 10, 2019 9:39:38 AM UTC, Rolf Eike Beer <eike@×××××××.de> |
4 |
> napisał(a): |
5 |
> > > Am Samstag, 21. September 2019, 10:50:07 CEST schrieb Rolf Eike Beer: |
6 |
> > > > Hi, |
7 |
> > > > |
8 |
> > > > I'm planning to do some cleanups to the qmail stuff. One thing s that the |
9 |
> > > > genqmail tarball is from 20080406 and needs to be patched itself, which |
10 |
> > > > makes things complicated. So, does anyone know what was the source of |
11 |
> > > > these tarballs? I can't look into the directory, maybe there are even |
12 |
> > > > older ones? |
13 |
> > > > Otherwise I would propose to just start a new git repo for that and do a |
14 |
> > > > new snapshot with the patches already incorporated. |
15 |
> > > |
16 |
> > > So I guess noone knows. Can someone assist me in creating a new upstream? I |
17 |
> > > have created a new git repository with the original tarball and the 2 |
18 |
> > > existing patches, which can be found here: |
19 |
> > > https://github.com/DerDakon/genqmail |
20 |
> > > |
21 |
> > > Please pick this up and move it somewhere into Gentoo git infrastructure. I |
22 |
> > > can transfer ownership to the Github Gentoo organization if you would like. |
23 |
> > > Afterwards I just need someone to push the button and create a new snapshot |
24 |
> > > from that (preferably together with a git tag). |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > Is there really a reason to do that? Since you're maintaining it, just keep |
27 |
> > it on your gh. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> I just want to prevent that the same thing happens again. |
30 |
> |
31 |
|
32 |
I don't see a difference between a stale repo on your GitHub account |
33 |
and a stale repo on Gentoo Infra. Except the former is easy to fork, |
34 |
and the latter we have in dozens, and nobody knows what to do with them. |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
Best regards, |
38 |
Michał Górny |