1 |
On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 13:36, David Bryson wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 03:03:37PM +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote: |
3 |
> > On Saturday 11 September 2004 14:58, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
4 |
> > > What's wrong with CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK? |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > Heh. Wasn't aware of that ;-) |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > I prefer having the /etc/portage/automerge.dirs config file anyhow. |
9 |
> > Individual entries can be commented by whichever admin added them, making it |
10 |
> > a little easier to maintain. |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> |
13 |
> is there anywhere that any of the functionality of /etc/portage is documented |
14 |
> ? All I ever hear are wisps of black magic and mystery about |
15 |
> /etc/portage/package.mask and other strange things like this comment here. |
16 |
|
17 |
It's also documented rather well in the portage man page. |
18 |
|
19 |
> |
20 |
> -- |
21 |
> gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
22 |
-- |
23 |
Ned Ludd <solar@g.o> |
24 |
Gentoo (hardened,security,infrastructure,embedded,toolchain) Developer |