Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
To: David Bryson <david@×××××××××.com>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] New tool: config-automerge
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 18:40:45
Message-Id: 1095100795.16694.749.camel@simple
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] New tool: config-automerge by David Bryson
1 On Mon, 2004-09-13 at 13:36, David Bryson wrote:
2 > On Sat, Sep 11, 2004 at 03:03:37PM +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote:
3 > > On Saturday 11 September 2004 14:58, Jason Stubbs wrote:
4 > > > What's wrong with CONFIG_PROTECT_MASK?
5 > >
6 > > Heh. Wasn't aware of that ;-)
7 > >
8 > > I prefer having the /etc/portage/automerge.dirs config file anyhow.
9 > > Individual entries can be commented by whichever admin added them, making it
10 > > a little easier to maintain.
11 > >
12 >
13 > is there anywhere that any of the functionality of /etc/portage is documented
14 > ? All I ever hear are wisps of black magic and mystery about
15 > /etc/portage/package.mask and other strange things like this comment here.
16
17 It's also documented rather well in the portage man page.
18
19 >
20 > --
21 > gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list
22 --
23 Ned Ludd <solar@g.o>
24 Gentoo (hardened,security,infrastructure,embedded,toolchain) Developer

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] New tool: config-automerge David Bryson <david@×××××××××.com>