| 1 |
On Tue, 2002-02-26 at 19:42, Gontran wrote: |
| 2 |
> * Teardrop Sky (sky@×××××××××××××××××××××××××××.com) wrote: |
| 3 |
> > [ XF 4.x not always usable ] |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > but i want to use XF 3.3.6, and how can i use it (installing from a |
| 6 |
> > source or binary whatever works) and then after installing it, letting |
| 7 |
> > the portage tree know that i *do* have X installed (so it will not |
| 8 |
> > emerge XF4 because it might be a requirement for some other portage |
| 9 |
> > package) |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I hear this. I run 3.3.6, in order to get maximum performance out of my |
| 12 |
> hardware setup. I did the dirty deed by hand, _after_ disapointment with |
| 13 |
> XF 4.1, overwriting any binaries. So portage sees the X requirement is |
| 14 |
> met. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Just curious, what kind of hardware setup is that? |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Joachim Blaabjerg |
| 20 |
styx@×××××.org |
| 21 |
www.SuxOS.org |
Archives