| 1 |
Il giorno dom, 13/02/2011 alle 14.22 -0500, Mike Frysinger ha scritto: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> thus it's a lot more sane in the long term to assume that packages |
| 4 |
> support the |
| 5 |
> latest rather than patching everyone (and being forced to carry those |
| 6 |
> custom |
| 7 |
> patches indefinitely) to set the ceiling at the last "known" working |
| 8 |
> version. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Okay so what would you think of installing the headers and .pc files for |
| 11 |
the "previous ABI" slotted packages? It would extend a bit more the |
| 12 |
non-latest, but wouldn't stray far from what we've done up to now, and |
| 13 |
we'd have a proof of concept to show upstream how to implements the |
| 14 |
fallbacks... then we could probably talk some of them to do just that. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes |
| 18 |
http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ |
Archives