| 1 |
On Mon, 16 May 2016 15:56:01 +0800 |
| 2 |
Ian Delaney <idella4@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> As long as this persists and is not intervened to polish and tidy up, |
| 4 |
> g-devs will persist in making innocent, naive or incompetent blunders |
| 5 |
> and run the gauntlet of being publicly scolded over errata. I can only |
| 6 |
> express my view that this style of personal demeaning potentially |
| 7 |
> results in embarrassment, public humiliation and drives community |
| 8 |
> members away from participation. The ultimate negative influence. I |
| 9 |
> would never entertain taking on eclass writing with the incumbent qa |
| 10 |
> member delivering assessments under the title of 'code review' in the |
| 11 |
> style he does. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
If you're writing the kind of code that results in you being subjected |
| 14 |
to scathing criticism for breaking metadata generation for the entire |
| 15 |
tree, then discouraging you from contributing can only be good for the |
| 16 |
distribution... |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives