Re: [gentoo-dev] Underscores in USE flags

[Mike Gilbert]

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 12:55 PM Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2019-09-20 at 12:41 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 12:11 PM Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2019-09-20 at 11:46 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > > > Recently, a large number of bugs were filed against packages that have
> > > > USE flag names which contain underscores. Apparently PMS prohibits
> > > > this except when the USE flag is part of a USE_EXPAND variable.
> > > >
> > > > https://projects.gentoo.org/pms/7/pms.html#x1-200003.1.4
> > > >
> > > > I'm not certain when this text was added to PMS, or how many of the
> > > > affected USE flags pre-date this policy.
> > > >
> > > > Portage seems to have no issue dealing with underscores, so this
> > > > doesn't seem to be solving any technical problem.
> > > >
> > > > I am pretty sure that renaming a bunch of USE flags will cause some
> > > > amount of end-user confusion, for very little benefit. Is enforcing
> > > > this part of PMS really worth it?
> > >
> > > And having packages with pretended-USE_EXPAND-that-does-not-work-as-
> > > USE_EXPAND is less confusing to the users?
> >
> > I doubt users immediately think "USE_EXPAND" when they see an underscore.
> >
> > Portage's seems fairly unambiguous to me. For example:
> >
> > % emerge -pv1O app-misc/foo
> >
> > These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
> >
> > [ebuild  N     ] app-misc/foo-0::local  USE="-modern_kernel"
> > PYTHON_TARGETS="python3_7" VIDEO_CARDS="radeon" 0 KiB
> >
> > Total: 1 package (1 new), Size of downloads: 0 KiB
> >
> > I don't think anyone would mistake "modern_kernel" for a USE_EXPAND
> > value  given the above.
> >
>
> Look at the humongous list of flags on dev-libs/aws-sdk-cpp.  They all
> start with 'aws_targets' which is a clear attempt to emulate USE_EXPAND.
> Expect that they won't work as USE_EXPAND, user typing:
>
>   AWS_TARGETS="foo bar baz"
>
> will just wildly confused, and in the end this prefixing is just silly
> and causes the flag names to become awfully long.

Ok, so you chery-picked one particularly horrible example. The Portage
output still puts them in USE="" section, though the user probably
won't see that given the massive USE flag list.

My point still stands for many of the other packages in the repo that
don't have several dozen flags.