1 |
On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 02:30:51PM -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: |
2 |
> Tom, you already know my opinion because we discussed it. I'm all |
3 |
> for it. Just a reminder: there's always problems somewhere in the |
4 |
> kernel which can be triggered by various options. The kernel is not |
5 |
> one big take it or leave it chunk of code, but many chunks |
6 |
> selectable by Kconfig with the exception of course of the core. The |
7 |
> best we can do wrt to BFQ and other "risky" patches is mark these |
8 |
> options as EXPERIMENTAL. I was going to say depend on |
9 |
> CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL in Kconfig, but this is deprecated. See |
10 |
> scripts/checkpatch.pl |
11 |
> |
12 |
> "Use of CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL is deprecated. For alternatives, see |
13 |
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/23/580" |
14 |
|
15 |
It's flat out gone now in the 3.10 kernel release, so if you use it, |
16 |
your code just will never be enabled. |
17 |
|
18 |
greg k-h |