Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Aron Griffis <agriffis@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage prize winners
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 17:35:05
Message-Id: 20040604173357.GC22790@time.flatmonk.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] portage prize winners by foser
1 foser wrote: [Thu Jun 03 2004, 02:50:00PM EDT]
2 > The problem is a lot of upstream packages do not do this right (rely
3 > on autodetection), so I don't think a bug avalanche is the answer
4 > here (cause it's a _lot_ of packages). It should be made aware to
5 > our devs why this is important so that configure scripts need to be
6 > fixed and the fixes sent upstream.
7
8 Okay, maybe not an avalanche, but I might do one per herd (probably
9 more sensible). I think this is really important stuff. We have so
10 many incoming bugs, and so many variables that can affect a build
11 (meaning things that can change, not environment variables). This is
12 one area where we have the ability to clean things up, so we should do
13 it.
14
15 Regards,
16 Aron
17
18 --
19 Aron Griffis
20 Gentoo Linux Developer

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] portage prize winners Josh Glover <jmglov@g.o>