1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
3 |
|
4 |
no corruption, people just dont update their Manifest files ... |
5 |
i run scripts on the tree every few days that updates them all :p |
6 |
- -mike |
7 |
|
8 |
On Wednesday 16 July 2003 11:50, Kumba wrote: |
9 |
> Dhruba Bandopadhyay wrote: |
10 |
> > Is there really a keyword in FEATURES called 'manifest'? It is |
11 |
> > certainly not documented in make.conf. Where is this declared? |
12 |
> |
13 |
> It was in portage for a time, during the 2.0.48_preX series of portage. |
14 |
> It basically cross-checks every file related to that package against |
15 |
> the manifest. Coupled with the "strict" keyword, it makes portage |
16 |
> extremely stingy on md5summing files. A single mismatch like I'm |
17 |
> getting and it will refuse to go any further. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> This is why I am wondering if 'manifest' may be buggy, or we have some |
20 |
> kind of minor corruption plaguing rsync somehow. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> --Kumba |
23 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
24 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) |
25 |
|
26 |
iQIVAwUBPxXtB0FjO5/oN/WBAQLVJBAA3cHWhnv+qjs80hu0wDphFm1jWOw9uqMd |
27 |
2dYaqROEpj+pRtvrUmtdE3gVb6Rg3NXcP9ilu/M+hG6WwetShvpA292FYsZXF47w |
28 |
kORwCqVJ3dpt82I7OgsrJxPKTpARptt1t7LRRcw02WYcTPBB5DctKjb9rEkpLV4f |
29 |
P0GvtUnvQcLLDf+lzu8/wIaXOBGeYcRDpDyNnTW6fP6vmf1BR0j4DkYdeJSxQq1y |
30 |
4yr80tnMPleCl23Qe1PHXG1Ozq9z273uOoW7L5bvgOa/e+evMdtOYRwa91KYiApQ |
31 |
ukp3TRCPM4rvMrMIE+J0hkb8b+1d2mJFtSB9IVMTNn1gBVmF0tsE2FujOIfJ3hNk |
32 |
dLh+na0TnWZDOoY0D7X3/cnkwfuR/zPRWF3d1qQuGnlus+sowHpWdhWCasFs4PiG |
33 |
T5u067Y0Kk4HreSBfwuPbJDNwhrXZOKm6160sAaiBqZBgyz2d15NO4xfFfAhv5rI |
34 |
A2E1tgdsY3GcoThhtEjfJ9bzKXPp2Z6GzwqvjfKPcuBqLatIqzD25FYLB1WAaxx7 |
35 |
EXMMFE9pEoBHNzEF7KSiu3oOSkPm2SVaNmRyuumUFwtxjZ1xNmqQSlD8LeR+CCpU |
36 |
bg7xBhqLdGnfmMJn/PDKwp2I80m5lbd+8Wme+jj+KJr0Fnb+qtNpKDRNgHaZZoqV |
37 |
jeTBvNpR8AA= |
38 |
=DF84 |
39 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
40 |
|
41 |
-- |
42 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |