1 |
On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 10:33 -0700, Chris Gianelloni wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> *sigh* |
4 |
|
5 |
It seems impossible to have any sort of discussion with you (unless one |
6 |
is in agreement with you, of course, and then one is "clear headed") |
7 |
without eliciting a *sigh* -- I don't think it's particularly the |
8 |
healthiest way to have one. If you simply don't like disagreement, then |
9 |
please be clear about that. |
10 |
|
11 |
> Why is it that everyone always assumes everything the Council does is |
12 |
> "out to get Ciaran" rather than something we see as a good global |
13 |
> solution to our current problems? |
14 |
|
15 |
Well, it would be great if the council can clearly outline what exactly |
16 |
our current problems are. Maybe if you presented those problems and |
17 |
then presented the proposed solutions to them, things would be easier to |
18 |
understand? |
19 |
|
20 |
|
21 |
> Here's a little hint for all of you conspiracy theorists out there. |
22 |
> |
23 |
> If all we wanted was to get rid of Ciaran, we'd just have a fucking vote |
24 |
> to get rid of Ciaran and make all of this *SO* much simpler on |
25 |
> ourselves. |
26 |
|
27 |
This is again a disparaging and unhealthy way to have a discussion. I'm |
28 |
going to request that if you will respond to my notes, please do so with |
29 |
some modicum of civility and respect. If you find yourself unable to do |
30 |
so, then please do not respond to me at all. |
31 |
|
32 |
> We're trying to solve the problem of people, *ALL* people, treating each |
33 |
> other like complete crap on our lists. The "problem" has been an issue |
34 |
> of discipline. We've simply got too many people who are too scared to |
35 |
> take any actions to resolve these problems. Why do you think Developer |
36 |
> Relations has all of these procedures and policies for retiring |
37 |
> developers? Is it because we need all of that to determine if someone |
38 |
> has crossed the line? No. It's because we have a large number of |
39 |
> developers (or possibly even just a very vocal minority) who complain |
40 |
> about every single damn thing anyone ever does and it has been much |
41 |
> simpler to make up these ridiculous guidelines and rules to follow in an |
42 |
> attempt to curb the dissenters than it is to just deal with them. |
43 |
|
44 |
Well, your own method of responding to my note is a good example of |
45 |
treating others like crap. How do we solve that? The problem with |
46 |
moderation is that nobody censors speech with which they agree, but |
47 |
quick to censor that with which they don't. |
48 |
|
49 |
So, here we have an example of one of the possible problems that you |
50 |
alluded to earlier: a vocal minority unable to pick its battles, and |
51 |
which engages in endless nitpicking. Why not just have the "fucking |
52 |
vote to get rid of [them] and make all of this *SO* much simpler on |
53 |
ourselves" then? Why should the vast majority of people on this list |
54 |
have to pay for what is, evidently, a minority? |
55 |
|
56 |
If, on the other hand, it's not a minority, then doesn't that indicate |
57 |
that the issue is on a deeper level? And if so, wouldn't it be more |
58 |
prudent to try and solve that one, instead? |
59 |
|
60 |
|
61 |
> I say drop the rules to something simple that makes sense, boot the |
62 |
> troublemakers, and ignore the dissenters. I'll gladly help anyone make |
63 |
> up any procmail recipes they need to filter their mail. Let's get back |
64 |
> to developing and leave the politics to Obama and Hillary. |
65 |
|
66 |
This is a little worrisome, you know. Perhaps you didn't mean this set |
67 |
of statements to sound as all-encompassing as all that. Isn't dissent |
68 |
and disagreement the result of differing points of view, which could |
69 |
actually benefit Gentoo? |
70 |
|
71 |
My thought is this: everyone should try and evaluate their own behaviour |
72 |
on this list, and the method in which they treat others. If each of us |
73 |
actually thought about the effects of our attitudes, this discussion |
74 |
might well be moot. |
75 |
|
76 |
Thanks, |
77 |
|
78 |
Seemant |