Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Drake Wyrm <wyrm@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Developer retirement
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 00:49:33
Message-Id: 20061017004554.GA5563@phaenix.haell.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Developer retirement by "Harald van Dijk"
1 Harald van D??k <truedfx@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 10:17:00AM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
3 > > Jakub Moc <jakub@g.o> wrote:
4 > > > Stephen Bennett napsal(a):
5 > > > > Please, try to stay on the right mailing list. It's very
6 > > > > annoying when you don't...
7 > > >
8 > > > No matter how hard I try, I always hit the _retarded_ behaviour of
9 > > > the _one_ mailing just that just _has_ to be special for _no_
10 > > > apparent reason at all.
11 > >
12 > > Can anybody explain how that one list is different from the others?
13 > > Are the headers being munged differently for gentoo-core?
14 >
15 > This list sets Reply-to to direct replies to the list. gentoo-core
16 > doesn't. People who just hit the Reply button in their mail clients
17 > end up replying to the author, rather than to the list.
18
19 Thank you, that does answer my question, but I'm still confused. I doubt
20 that gentoo-dev sent the email to which jakub replied. How, then, did he
21 manage to reply to gentoo-dev?
22
23 --
24 The road to Heck is paved with mediocre intentions.
25 --
26 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Developer retirement "Harald van Dijk" <truedfx@g.o>