| 1 |
----- Original Message ----- |
| 2 |
From: "Bart Verwilst" <bart.verwilst@×××××××.be> |
| 3 |
To: <gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org> |
| 4 |
Sent: Monday, October 01, 2001 8:09 PM |
| 5 |
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] eclasses v3 released |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
> > If on the other hand, drobbins' argument is against Dan seemingly |
| 9 |
> > recruiting any and all, or newcomers to Gentoo, then I understand it a |
| 10 |
bit |
| 11 |
> > more. While I still think Dan should be entitled to recruit the help of |
| 12 |
> > any of the other Gentoo developers, Dan should perhaps have handled |
| 13 |
things |
| 14 |
> > a bit differently and required that Verwilst sent the eclass-based |
| 15 |
ebuilds |
| 16 |
> > directly to himself instead checking it into CVS. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> First of all, Dan didn't 'recruite' me, drobbins did, and i'm trying to do |
| 19 |
> the |
| 20 |
> best i can for Gentoo, i really love the distro, otherwise i wouldn't want |
| 21 |
> to become |
| 22 |
> a developer on it. |
| 23 |
> Secondly, i sent all the eclass-based ebuild to Dan for his approval, I |
| 24 |
> never submitted |
| 25 |
> them myself using cvs. I have (or at least i had, hope i still have it) a |
| 26 |
> non-eclass kdevelop |
| 27 |
> ebuild... I can replace that with the eclass-based one if you want... |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
> Bye |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> Bart |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
And there goes my page-layout again... |
| 34 |
pfff... suckie Outlook Express.. |
Archives