Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: sf <sf@×××××.de>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Cc: gentoo-user@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: emerge-webrsync bandwidth improvement
Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 12:31:48
Message-Id: 4278BF96.2000909@b-i-t.de
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] emerge-webrsync bandwidth improvement by Brian Harring
1 Brian Harring wrote:
2 ...
3 > It's a work in progress, but it's been functional without any major
4 > bugs for a few weeks now, so if you're interested, take it for a spin.
5
6 Thanks in advance for your effort.
7
8 On first invocation emerge-delta-webrsync pulled a complete snapshot (as
9 described in your blog). On second invocation I got:
10
11 Looking for available base versions for a delta
12 fetching patches
13 failed fetching snapshot-20050503-20050504.patch.bz2.md5sum
14 no patches found? up to date? syncing
15 Syncing local tree...
16 building file list ...
17 114391 files to consider
18
19 Number of files: 114391
20 Number of files transferred: 0
21 Total file size: 89923713 bytes
22 Total transferred file size: 0 bytes
23 Literal data: 0 bytes
24 Matched data: 0 bytes
25 File list size: 2701117
26 Total bytes written: 2701170
27 Total bytes read: 20
28
29 wrote 2701170 bytes read 20 bytes 125636.74 bytes/sec
30 total size is 89923713 speedup is 33.29
31 cleaning up
32 transferring metadata/cache
33 skipping sync
34
35 >>> Updating Portage cache: 100%
36
37
38 Is there any way to skip syncing if no patches are found? emerge sync
39 uses a timestamp for that purpose, doesn't it?
40
41 Regards
42 Stephan
43
44 --
45 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: emerge-webrsync bandwidth improvement Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o>