| 1 |
> On 7 Nov 2022, at 06:07, Oskari Pirhonen <xxc3ncoredxx@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 11:37:24 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote: |
| 4 |
>> I would be in favour of stepping up the social contract and actually |
| 5 |
>> prohibiting this kind of things, we had that before too, the nattka you |
| 6 |
>> mgorny wrote is replacement for old bugzilla bot that was ... |
| 7 |
>> closedsource and perished, though nattka now have way more features than |
| 8 |
>> the old thing ever had. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> As a user, I think it would be really cool if there was a requirement |
| 11 |
> that all infra and infra-adjacent stuff was free software. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I feel like I've read that Debian already has something like this. While |
| 14 |
> doing some quick searches I didn't find a full-on requirement, but all |
| 15 |
> their infra bits I did find were powered by free software. The most |
| 16 |
> relevant ones being buildd [1] and debci [2]. Additionally, the debci |
| 17 |
> docs has inctructions on reproducing tests yourself [3] which is a nice |
| 18 |
> extra IMO. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Gentoo has https://www.gentoo.org/get-started/philosophy/social-contract.html. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Best, |
| 23 |
sam |
Archives