| 1 |
On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 11:37:24 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote: |
| 2 |
> I would be in favour of stepping up the social contract and actually |
| 3 |
> prohibiting this kind of things, we had that before too, the nattka you |
| 4 |
> mgorny wrote is replacement for old bugzilla bot that was ... |
| 5 |
> closedsource and perished, though nattka now have way more features than |
| 6 |
> the old thing ever had. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
As a user, I think it would be really cool if there was a requirement |
| 9 |
that all infra and infra-adjacent stuff was free software. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
I feel like I've read that Debian already has something like this. While |
| 12 |
doing some quick searches I didn't find a full-on requirement, but all |
| 13 |
their infra bits I did find were powered by free software. The most |
| 14 |
relevant ones being buildd [1] and debci [2]. Additionally, the debci |
| 15 |
docs has inctructions on reproducing tests yourself [3] which is a nice |
| 16 |
extra IMO. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
[1] https://buildd.debian.org |
| 19 |
[2] https://ci.debian.net |
| 20 |
[3] https://ci.debian.net/doc/file.MAINTAINERS.html |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
- Oskari |
Archives