| 1 |
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 8:15 AM Thomas Deutschmann <whissi@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On 2019-09-05 06:02, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> In my case I am working on a new mysql eclass to outsource pkg_config |
| 5 |
> >> function which is shared at least between dev-db/mysql and |
| 6 |
> >> dev-db/percona-server (and maybe dev-db/mariadb). |
| 7 |
> >> |
| 8 |
> >> For this new eclass I would say it's a "per-package" eclass and would |
| 9 |
> >> probably have skipped mailing list review, too. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > Everyone can skip as many paragraphs as they want, and then apply what's |
| 12 |
> > said later to something said way earlier. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Could you please stop adding any bad interpretation? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> That was a serious question. For you, it's pretty clear. I am showing |
| 17 |
> you, that for me, it isn't pretty clear. When you believe I skipped |
| 18 |
> important lines in my quote please outline what I have missed and I will |
| 19 |
> take the blame. |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
You'll note the bit you quoted in defense of skipping review says |
| 23 |
"changes", and the bit about new eclasses says "do not skip this step". |
Archives