Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Dan Meltzer <parallelgrapefruit@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Per-category and per-package eclasses
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 13:08:14
Message-Id: 46059ce10504250608421915ff@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Per-category and per-package eclasses by Elfyn McBratney
1 I can see the use for a category one, but I can see no point for a
2 package-local one, if you're going to have it specific for one
3 package, why not just put it in the ebuild, and have no eclass at all?
4
5 On 4/25/05, Elfyn McBratney <beu@g.o> wrote:
6 > Hi folks,
7 >
8 > The other night, some of us in #gentoo-uk got talking about per-category and
9 > per-package eclasses, the idea being that each category, and each package,
10 > could have it's own 'eclass' subdirectory containing category- or
11 > package-local eclasses. This in addition to having global eclasses in
12 > gentoo-x86/eclass.
13 >
14 > For example (totally hypothetical), the php-sapi* eclasses would be a primse
15 > example of a category-local eclass (their only used by the PHP SAPI ebuilds).
16 > I can't find any eclasses that exist currently that'd be a good example of a
17 > local-eclass, but hopefully you get the idea.
18 >
19 > Thoughts ? Anything I've missed ciaranm ? :)
20 >
21 > Best,
22 > Elfyn
23 >
24 > --
25 > Elfyn McBratney http://beu.merseine.nu/
26 > beu/irc.freenode.net http://dev.gentoo.org/~beu/
27 > +------------O.o--------------------- http://dev.gentoo.org/~beu/pubkey.asc
28 >
29 > PGP Key ID: 0x69DF17AD
30 > PGP Key Fingerprint:
31 > DBD3 B756 ED58 B1B4 47B9 B3BD 8D41 E597 69DF 17AD
32 >
33 >
34 >
35
36 --
37 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Per-category and per-package eclasses Marius Mauch <genone@g.o>