1 |
I can see the use for a category one, but I can see no point for a |
2 |
package-local one, if you're going to have it specific for one |
3 |
package, why not just put it in the ebuild, and have no eclass at all? |
4 |
|
5 |
On 4/25/05, Elfyn McBratney <beu@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
> Hi folks, |
7 |
> |
8 |
> The other night, some of us in #gentoo-uk got talking about per-category and |
9 |
> per-package eclasses, the idea being that each category, and each package, |
10 |
> could have it's own 'eclass' subdirectory containing category- or |
11 |
> package-local eclasses. This in addition to having global eclasses in |
12 |
> gentoo-x86/eclass. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> For example (totally hypothetical), the php-sapi* eclasses would be a primse |
15 |
> example of a category-local eclass (their only used by the PHP SAPI ebuilds). |
16 |
> I can't find any eclasses that exist currently that'd be a good example of a |
17 |
> local-eclass, but hopefully you get the idea. |
18 |
> |
19 |
> Thoughts ? Anything I've missed ciaranm ? :) |
20 |
> |
21 |
> Best, |
22 |
> Elfyn |
23 |
> |
24 |
> -- |
25 |
> Elfyn McBratney http://beu.merseine.nu/ |
26 |
> beu/irc.freenode.net http://dev.gentoo.org/~beu/ |
27 |
> +------------O.o--------------------- http://dev.gentoo.org/~beu/pubkey.asc |
28 |
> |
29 |
> PGP Key ID: 0x69DF17AD |
30 |
> PGP Key Fingerprint: |
31 |
> DBD3 B756 ED58 B1B4 47B9 B3BD 8D41 E597 69DF 17AD |
32 |
> |
33 |
> |
34 |
> |
35 |
|
36 |
-- |
37 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |