1 |
Le dimanche 20 avril 2008 à 20:25 +0300, Alon Bar-Lev a écrit : |
2 |
> On 4/20/08, Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
> > for what it's worth, as a gnome dev I didn't see any convincing |
4 |
> > arguments as to why it should be renamed. Gnome makes things optional |
5 |
> > for other to reuse (like xfce) but afaik no other "keyring" like |
6 |
> > programs are optional deps of another package in portage. Let's not cast |
7 |
> > a simple change into breakage for users already using it (even in |
8 |
> > stable, and yes I'm lazy :D). |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Lazy is the word. |
11 |
> I cannot argue with this one, I just know that it won't be the gnome |
12 |
> herd who do the work when the time come to fix this (resolve |
13 |
> conflict). |
14 |
> The gnome herd will re-introduce the lazy ticket, and make other herd |
15 |
> use yet another confusing USE flag. |
16 |
> This is not the right way to maintain long term constants. |
17 |
|
18 |
failure, you tried to argue ;) |
19 |
|
20 |
> You asked for objections... You got some. |
21 |
> |
22 |
> You can leave this local USE flag, and stay with generic term. |
23 |
> Or you can rename it when it goes global so it have proper name. |
24 |
> You can also ignore this and force gnome onto all users. |
25 |
|
26 |
Seriously though, when I find stuff to fix, I try to fix it. I just |
27 |
don't see anything to fix right now. |
28 |
|
29 |
-- |
30 |
Gilles Dartiguelongue <eva@g.o> |
31 |
Gentoo |