1 |
On Monday 12 September 2005 02:25, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> If you're not up for having your code reviewed, don't contribute to an |
3 |
> open source project. No-one expects you to produce perfect code |
4 |
> straight off (at least, we don't until we give you commit access). We |
5 |
> *do* expect you to be prepared to respond to constructive criticism and |
6 |
> improve your code. |
7 |
|
8 |
Personally I think you're just going a bit wild by closing the bug reports as |
9 |
wont fix and expecting users to fix them. That's part of developers job, if |
10 |
someone takes into account adding an ebuild to the official tree, isn't it?! |
11 |
While I can understand your motivation, I'd like to know if your doing is |
12 |
backed up by at least an informal decision (didn't follow the threads which |
13 |
resulted in the maintainer* aliases, etc.), because we have enough whining |
14 |
guys, who don't understand that our ressources are limited. Caring for the |
15 |
quality of stuff, that is not part of the official tree is only bad PR, but |
16 |
not a win for us, imho. |
17 |
|
18 |
|
19 |
Carsten |