Archives
Archives
| From: | Stephen Bennett <spb@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] crap use flags in the profiles | ||
| Date: | Tue, 30 Aug 2005 20:31:20 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20050830214002.1ce72cc2@localhost | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] crap use flags in the profiles by Luis Medinas |
||
| 1 | On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 21:15:18 +0000 |
| 2 | Luis Medinas <metalgod@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | |
| 4 | > I belive the worse QA is in x86 and not in AMD64 and MIPS. Between |
| 5 | > AMD64 and x86 there's a lot of differences i.e. many packages in the |
| 6 | > tree that needs to be patched to work on AMD64 so we cannot cover |
| 7 | > AMD64/x86 under the same keyword. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | There are packages that will work on (for example) little-endian mips |
| 10 | but won't work or will need patching to work on big-endian, yet we |
| 11 | still cover both of those with one keyword. |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] crap use flags in the profiles | Olivier Crete <tester@g.o> |
| [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: [gentoo-core] crap use flags in the profiles | Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net> |