Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Ferris McCormick <fmccor@g.o>
To: Aron Griffis <agriffis@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] proposed solution to arches/stable problem
Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 18:40:47
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.58.0406221739200.11067@lacewing.inforead.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] proposed solution to arches/stable problem by Aron Griffis
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Tue, 22 Jun 2004, Aron Griffis wrote:
5
6 > Ferris McCormick wrote: [Tue Jun 22 2004, 11:59:44AM EDT]
7 > > I rather like this approach. I think it addresses the maintainers'
8 > > concerns, and allows the arch maintainers to proceed if necessary.
9 > > Maybe your suggestion can help cool off this discussion.
10 >
11 > :-) I'm glad you like it.
12 >
13 > What do you think of my more recent suggestion, that we use the first
14 > keyword in the list to indicate the maintainer's arch, thereby
15 > alleviating the need for an additional keyword?
16
17 I think I prefer the additional keyword. I am more interested in the
18 maintainer's opinion than I am in the maintainer's architecture, and the
19 extra keyword makes it clear the maintainer is signing off. After all,
20 if I or anyone else keywords a package without adding the 'stable,' it
21 is very clear that for some reason an architecture is compelled to jump
22 ahead. I also want to know if there is an active maintainer ---
23
24 But then, I have been working in some dusty corners of the portage tree,
25 where I am not sure there even is a maintainer anymore. I recently marked
26 a package stable for sparc, and the keywording on it now looks like this:
27
28 KEYWORDS="~x86 ~ppc sparc mips ~alpha arm ~hppa amd64 ~ia64 ppc64 s390"
29
30 Changelog indicates a lot of recent activity, metadata indicates no-herd,
31 no maintainer, and I haven't a clue which if any architecture controls.
32 I would value the opinion of whoever is lead on this package (unless it's
33 me??? ciaranm did tell me that if I touched it, it was mine....).
34
35 (Oh, what is it? This package is dev-lang/tcl-8.4.6, and a few recent
36 additions to Gentoo depend on it. It is almost certainly stable on
37 everything, but all I can speak to is sparc.)
38
39 Regards,
40 Ferris
41
42 - --
43 Ferris McCormick (P44646, MI) <fmccor@g.o>
44 Developer, Gentoo Linux (Sparc)
45 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
46 Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
47
48 iD8DBQFA2HWtQa6M3+I///cRAuiVAKC49b0TnVfiwNbod2l8sXtuYeuUegCgvYKa
49 72KYA1FLgB5BHGavOsIlRrk=
50 =zVjY
51 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
52
53 --
54 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] proposed solution to arches/stable problem Aron Griffis <agriffis@g.o>