| 1 |
mån 2001-12-03 klockan 17.48 skrev Daniel Robbins: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2001 at 05:06:53PM -0800, Zach Forrest wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> > It may, then, also make sense to give a little more structure to the |
| 5 |
> > optimization settings. For example: |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > optimization_var={ |
| 8 |
> > "host":"i686", |
| 9 |
> > "chost":"i686-pc-linux-gnu", |
| 10 |
> > "cflags":"-mcpu=i686 -march=i686 -O3 -pipe", |
| 11 |
> > "cxxflags":"-mcpu=i686 -march=i686 -O3 -pipe"} |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> It would make my life easier if we would use python-based configuration |
| 14 |
> files. Right now, they're parsed. But being able to define dictionaries |
| 15 |
> is really appealing to me right now :) |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
The problem with this is that it's harder to edit in a regular browser, |
| 18 |
not much hard but still, somewhat harder. |
| 19 |
Also, it's quite nice to be able to override with regular environment |
| 20 |
variables. I guess this can be done no matter.. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
About using GConf, imho it's actually not a totally bad idea. It is |
| 23 |
thought of as being for the entire system (will never happend though). |
| 24 |
Currently it has some weird deps (like gnome-libs->gtk+->X11) which is |
| 25 |
no good. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
It does not store it's configuration in a binary database, it's in |
| 28 |
xml-files in /etc/gconf. Anyway, I'm more in favor of something that's |
| 29 |
easily editable in a normal text editor. |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Regards, |
| 32 |
Mikael Hallendal |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
Mikael Hallendal http://micke.hallendal.net/ |
| 36 |
Stockholm, Sweden Cell: +46 (0)709 718 918 |
Archives