Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] desktop
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 14:10:49
Message-Id: 20030828141056.GJ6635@enki.datanode.net
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] desktop by Paul de Vrieze
1 Naively stepping into this fray, how does this menu system differ from
2 genmenu (x11-misc/genmenu) which has in my use generated some rather nice
3 menus for my not-big-boy wm's (*box, wmaker, etc)?
4
5
6 On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 04:00:13PM +0200, Paul de Vrieze wrote:
7 > The menu system is not about having the same menu in all windowmanagers as
8 > much as it is about having every application added to the menu of whatever
9 > windowmanager you are using. Independent of what kind of toolkit the
10 > application uses. A vanilla useflag would function like currently the foreign
11 > package flag does for the kdeadmin ebuild. That flag enables the compilation
12 > of a package manager that is standard but currently does not work well with
13 > gentoo (it being not an rpm based system).
14 >
15 > For the menu system it might be necessary to patch some windowmanagers to be
16 > able to use our menu's while keeping some compatibility with a situation
17 > where the menu manager is not installed. Those changes are normally small and
18 > localised, but generally change some part of the plumbing of such a program
19 > while keeping generally the same behaviour. If you want to hack with a
20 > windowmanager yourself those changes might be confusing and hence the
21 > "vanilla" flag.
22 >
23 >
24
25 --
26
27
28 -----o()o---------------------------------------------
29 | http://www.gentoo.org/
30 | #gentoo-dev on irc.freenode.net
31 Gentoo Dev | #gentoo-perl on irc.freenode.net
32 Perl Guy |
33 | GnuPG Key ID: AB5CED4E9E7F4E2E
34 -----o()o---------------------------------------------
35
36
37 --
38 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] desktop foser <foser@×××××××××××××××××.net>