From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) | ||
Date: | Fri, 30 May 2008 23:26:52 | ||
Message-Id: | 20080531002644.41d9b7bf@snowcone | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) by Luca Barbato |
1 | On Sat, 31 May 2008 01:13:58 +0200 |
2 | Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
3 | > I know exactly which standard -ffast-math violates (IEEE/ISO floating |
4 | > point spec) and how (the man page is quite complete about this), |
5 | > --as-needed doesn't have any warning about this, there isn't any |
6 | > standard that it violates since it's the default behavior at least |
7 | > for 2 platform (one from those who wrote most of the ELF spec...). |
8 | > Point the spec, and the paragraph violated. |
9 | |
10 | ISO/IEC 14882:1998 section 3.7.1 paragraph 2. |
11 | |
12 | -- |
13 | Ciaran McCreesh |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) | Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: --as-needed to default LDFLAGS (Was: RFC: Should preserve-libs be enabled by default?) | Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> |