| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On Monday 08 December 2003 09:41 pm, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 5 |
> Speaking of the java USE flag, I would suggest that a new java-dev flag |
| 6 |
> should still add gcj to gcc. If a java developer doesn't want gcj, that's a |
| 7 |
> per-package customization issue that will be fully supported in portage-ng |
| 8 |
> (and 2.0.50?) |
| 9 |
Shouldn't gcj be enabled simply by java-user? How else are they going to |
| 10 |
emerge/compile a Java pkg? |
| 11 |
- -- |
| 12 |
Luke-Jr |
| 13 |
Developer, Gentoo Linux |
| 14 |
http://www.gentoo.org/ |
| 15 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 16 |
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
iD8DBQE/1PSBZl/BHdU+lYMRAsZ+AKCdoTF+Tx0z2tgPLsGJw89ghB8sgQCeOOpu |
| 19 |
0CROPKEsyNsUCWHHxyIf5/E= |
| 20 |
=VfrL |
| 21 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives