| 1 |
On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 08:57:27AM -0700, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 |
> > In light of the above, how about 'automatic=0'? |
| 3 |
> Please keep with your original idea of letting maintainers opt out vs |
| 4 |
> some of the ideas proposed in this thread where maintainers have to opt |
| 5 |
> in as I'm sure the metadata.xml files wont be updated by enough people |
| 6 |
> to really gain the benefit of what we are trying to do here if they have |
| 7 |
> to do opt in. |
| 8 |
Err, nowhere in here have I said it was going to be opt-in. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Taking into account the other reasonable input, how about the name of |
| 11 |
attribute 'automatic-bug' ? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
'automatic-bug=1' will be implied by the DTD, and developers will have |
| 14 |
to explicitly opt-out by including 'automatic-bug=0' in their |
| 15 |
<maintainer> entries. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-- |
| 18 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
| 19 |
Gentoo Linux Developer & Council Member |
| 20 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
| 21 |
GnuPG FP : 11AC BA4F 4778 E3F6 E4ED F38E B27B 944E 3488 4E85 |
Archives