| 1 |
On 12/24/05, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Fri, 23 Dec 2005 23:56:37 -0800 Brian Harring <ferringb@g.o> |
| 3 |
> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | It's really pretty simple- get off your butt and chip in if you want |
| 5 |
> | it, else you're on _our_ timeline (eg, we implement it when we deem |
| 6 |
> | it sane/ready to go). |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Is Portage development done to support the needs of those of us who |
| 9 |
> provide the tree, or is the tree expected to be restricted to whatever |
| 10 |
> Portage developers feel like implementing? |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
I'd say the latter. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
The tree is restricted to what is implemented in portage, and as it is |
| 15 |
a volunteer organization, what is implemented is what the portage |
| 16 |
dev's feel like implementing. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
If you want more to be implemented, submit patches. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> -- |
| 21 |
> Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I can kill you with my brain) |
| 22 |
> Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
| 23 |
> Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives