| 1 |
* Tiziano Müller <dev-zero@g.o>: |
| 2 |
> Torsten Veller schrieb: |
| 3 |
> > Let me please point out that no infrastructure team member is |
| 4 |
> > on the list right now. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > As infra is often involved in implementing council decisions we should |
| 7 |
> > take care that the information flows. IMHO the easiest way to achieve this |
| 8 |
> > is electing an infra member to the council. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> In the contrary. We should see that not too much power/responsibility is |
| 11 |
> concentrated on a single person. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Since... |
| 14 |
> a) This guarantees that the council comes to a decision which is not |
| 15 |
> influenced by the (direct and already known) interest of it's members |
| 16 |
> and |
| 17 |
> b) Reduces the risk for Gentoo when someone with more than one key |
| 18 |
> position leaves |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
If devs in a key position leave, it's often a problem. But I don't see |
| 21 |
a concentration problem here. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
> And if someone has to be in a council/whatsoever to get the relevant |
| 24 |
> information, something else is broken. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
I didn't write that and didn't meant that. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> And tweaking the election procedure to reach that someone from a |
| 29 |
> special project is elected is somehow questionable, don't you think? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
No. I also vote this way. |
| 32 |
I want the council to represent Gentoo as a whole and be represented by |
| 33 |
Gentoo as a whole. I think it helps the other council members too if |
| 34 |
there is e.g. an infra member to take care of the infra stance. |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
But: A council without an infra member can do a good job too. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
Thanks. |
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives